Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 13 Sport 5 Act (XX of 1974), Section 6 Grant of any perpetual Article Guarantee to the accused, for the purpose of investigating the accused I don't need any further delay. Year in case registration, further inquiry found accused allowed bail in circumstances
1985 M L D 1072

[Lahore]

Before Ijaz Nisar, J

MUHAMMAD IQBAL--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 576/13 of 1985, decided on 31st March, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497--Emigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Ss. 17 & 22--13assport5 Act (XX of 1974), S. 6 Bail grant of--No incriminating article recovered from accused--Accused no more required for purpose of investigation- Delay of one year in registration of case--Case, found to be of further inquiry--Accused allowed bail in circumstances.

Syed Ahmad Saeed Kirmani for Petitioner.

Hasnat Ahmad Khan for the State.

ORDER

The petitioner is charged under section 17/22 of the Emigration Ordinance, 1979 and section 6 of the Passport Act, 1974 on the allegation that he received money from several persons on the pretext of providing jobs to them in Saudi Arabia.

Learned counsel states that the alleged occurrence had taken place in 1983 while the case was registered a year after the alleged payment had been made to the petitioner. In the first F.I.R. the allegation against the petitioner was that he had circulated among the persons defrauded that one Saudi National had come to recruit persons for Saudi Arabia and that he had a demand of 320 persons. The said Saudi National had interviewed the intending Emigrants and received the amount himself, The house of Aslam co-accused was raided and 23 passports were recovered.

It is contended that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. Neither any passport nor any visa form nor any seal or stamp have been recovered from the petitioners possession. His person is not required for the purpose of investigation because the challange has been submitted in the Court. Furthers that there is a delay of one year in the registration of the case.

In the above circumstances, it appears to be a case of further enquiry. Accordingly I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (Central) Lahore. .

S.A.

Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
us immigration advocates from Ugoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.