Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALTAF HUSAIN SHAH SHERAZI versus STATE


Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (I1 of 1971), Section 17, 184 22 Passport Act (XX of 1974), Section 6 Bail Investigation Officer states that the accused was a fugitive and was arrested after four years. Deprives 9 of them of money sent to abroad for trial and is unable to approve bail set for trial, trial, bail

1985 M L D 826

[Lahore]

Before Mazharul Haq, J

Syed ALTAF -HUSSAIN SHAH SHERAZI--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 15321B of 1985, decided, on 9th July, 1985,

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Emigration Ordinance (I1 of 1976), Ss. 17, 18 4 22--Passports Act (XX of 1974), S. 6--Bail--investigating Officer stating, that accused was a proclaimed offender and was arrested after four years of occurrence--Accused deprived 9 persons of money on pretext of sending them abroad--Trial commended and case fixed for evidence--Case, held, not fit for grant of bail in circumstances--Bail refused.

S.M. Nazim for Petitioner.

Bashir Parvez for the State.

ORDER

Syed Altaf Hussain Shah Sherazi petitioner is accused of the offence under sections 17, 18 and 22 of the Immigration Ordinance, 1979, read with section E of the Passport Act, 1974. Case was registered against him on 23-3-1983 at Police Station, F. I. A., Lahore.

2. petitioner is alleged to have deprived nine persons of Rs.2,05,000 on the pretext of sending them abroad. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the occurrence took place in 1980 and that the F.I.A. has been sleeping over the matter for such a long time. Next contended that the matter has been put up because one Hafeez of Gujranwala by fraud took Rs.24,000 from the petitioner on the pretext of sending his relatives abroad and when he agitated the matter, a false case has been cooked up against him.

3. The Investigating Officer who is present with record stated that the petitioner was a proclaimed offender and was arrested in 1984. There are nine persons who are named in the F.I.R. who allegedly parted with the money on petitioner's false representation. Learned A State counsel has brought to my notice that the trial has also commenced and the case is fixed for evidence. Under these circumstances 1 do not consider it a fit case for bail. This petition is dismissed. Trial Court is, however, directed to expedite the trial in this case and if possible, the case be taken up on day to day hearing.

M . Y . H .

Bail refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.