Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PENLWAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Adultery

1985 M L D 726 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

PEHLWAN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3168-B of 1983, decided on 31st December, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 498--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S. 10/16--Accused although arrested four months back yet no challan submitted in Court--Allegations of Zina not made against accused--Bail allowed.

Lal Khan Balouch for Petitioner.

Malik Abdur Rehman for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Phelwan, petitioner, in a case under section 10/16 of the offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, registered at Police Station Mochiwala vide F.I.R. No. 1, dated 14-1-1983.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner and others abducted Mst. Maryam in order to subject her to sexual intercourse.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no allegations of Zina against the petitioner and although five months have passed yet no challan has been submitted. On the other hand learned counsel for the State has seriously opposed this application on the ground that the alleged offence is a heinous one and that the learned Sessions Judge has given cogent reasons for refusing bail to the petitioner.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel with care. I find that although the petitioner was arrested five months back yet no challan has been submitted so far and that there are no allegations of Zina against the petitioner. To my mind it is a fit case for grant of bail. He is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Jhang.

M.Y.H.

Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Dhatmal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.