Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUR REHMAN KHAN versus AMIR FHATOON


Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961 Section 10 West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV Of 1964), Schedule, Section 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Appeal against removal for non-submission of statistical data from the recovery of Dwyer amount. The decree was not required in court to maintain an appeal in the lower appellate court

1985 M L D 200

[Lahore]

Before Zia Mahmood Mirza, J

ABDUR REHMAN KHAN--Petitioner

versus

Kist. AMIR KHATOON and others--Respondents

Writ Petition No. 4220 of 1982, heard on 5th June, 1985.

Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VIII of 1961)--

---S. 10--West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Sched., S.5--Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199--Recovery of dower amount--Decree for--Appeal against--Dismissal of for non-deposit of decretal amount--Held, depositing of decretal amount in Court was not necessary to maintain appeal in lower appellate Court--Case remanded for decision on appeal in accordance with law.

Ch. Abdul Hamid for Petitioner.

Wasim Sajjad for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 5th June, 1985.

JUDGMENT

In this case, suit for the, recovery of Rs.20,000 as dower filed by respondent No.l was decreed by the learned Family Court by order, dated 3-5-1982. Petitioner filed an- appeal before the learned District Judge which the learned Additional District Judge dismissed by his judgment, dated 8-9-1982 holding that "it was necessary for, Abdur Rehman appellant to deposit the decretal amount in the, Court and in this connection a specific direction was given to him, vide order, dated 14-7-1982 of this Court to deposit the decretal amount in this Court uptill 1-9-1982 but the same has not been deposited."

2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. l has quite frankly conceded that it was not necessary for the petitioner to deposit the decretal amount to maintain the appeal before the .learned Additional District Judge. In this view of the matter, appeal was dismissed by A the learned Additional District Judge on incorrect premises. This -writ petition is, therefore, allowed and the order of the learned Additional District Judge, dated 8-9-1982 is set aside and the case' is remanded to him for fresh decision of the appeal in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs in the circumstances 6f the case.

H.B.T.

Writ accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Kabir Wala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.