Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MESSRS ARAG INDUSTRIES LTD. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (WEST), KARACHI


The waiver exemption granted to Section 4 licensed manufacturers is justified in addition to the sale to four licensed manufacturers whose licenses were subsequently revoked, but when their licenses existed. The sale was given to licensed manufacturers and was the right of accessory. Exemption under section 4 in relation to sale to licensed manufacturers

1985 P T D 190

[Karachi High Court]

Before Nasir Aslam Zahid and Ally Madad Shah, JJ

Messrs ARAG INDUSTRIES Ltd.

versus

THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX (WEST), KARACHI and another

Sales Tax Case No. 46 of 1973, decided on 23rd January, 1984.

Sales Tax Act (III of 1951)‑‑

‑‑‑S.4‑‑Sale made to licensed manufacturers‑Entitlement to exemption‑ Assessee showing sales including sales made to four licensed manu facturers whose licences were cancelled later on, but when sales were made their licences were in existence‑‑Sales, held, were made to licensed manufacturers and assessee was entitled to exemption under S.4 in regard to sales made to licensed manufacturers.

Shafique Textile Mills Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Sales Tax 1983 P T D 44 rel.

Mansoor Ahmad Khan for Applicant.

Nasrullah Awan for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 23rd January 1984.

JUDGMENT

NASIR ASLAM ZAHID, J.‑

‑ The question raised in this reference under section 17(1) of the Sales Tax Act, 1951 filed by the applicants is as follows:‑

"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessee was not entitled to exemption under section 4 of the Sales Tax Act in regard to sales made to the four licensed manufacturers mentioned in para. 3 of the reference "

2. The reference relates to the assessment year 1964‑65. At that time the name of the applicant‑Company was Habib Textile Mills Limited but the same was changed on 5‑7‑1968 to its present name that is Arag Industries Limited pursuant to section 11(2) & (5) of the Companies Act, 1913. In the year in question, the applicant/ assessee carrying on business of Textile Mill, had sold cotton yarn to various purchasers including manufacturers in possession of manufacturers' licences issued under section 8 of the Sales Tax Act, 1951. In the return submitted under section 10(1) of the 1951 Act to the department, the assessee had shown the sales including sales made to four licensed manufacturers mentioned in para 3 of the reference. The licences of the said four purchasers were later on cancelled by the department but it is' an admitted position that when the sales were made, the licences of the aforesaid four parties were in existence and had not been cancelled. It is contended by Mr. Mansoor Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the applicants, that in these circumstances the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 4 of the Sales Tax Act, 1951 in regard to the sales made to the aforesaid four licensed manufacturers. The Income‑tax Tribunal took the view that the assessee was not ‑entitled to exemption. Learned counsel for the applicants has referred to the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in the case of Fazal Shafique Textile Mills Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Sales Tax reported in 1983 P T D 44. In that case an identical question had arisen in facts similar to the facts of this case and it was held that what was required under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act, 1951 to entitle an assessee to claim exemption of Sales Tax Act on sales under section 4(a) of the Act was that the sales were made by the assessee of partly manufactured goods to a licensed manufacturer. It is conceded by Mr. Nasarullah Awan, learned counsel for the department that the facts and point of law involved in the (1983) 47 Taxation 153 are the same as in the instant case. No argument had been advanced before us to take a different view that has been taken in (1983) 47 Taxation 153.

3. We are of the view that as the sales in this case had been made to licensed manufacturers, the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 4 of the Sales Tax Act in regard to the sales made to the aforesaid four licensed manufacturers. The question referred ' in this case is accordingly answered in the negative.

4. There will be no order as to costs.

M.B.A. Question answered in negative

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
registration advocate from Bannu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.