In terms of Articles 18 and 23, the increase in compensation in respect of the court was occupied by the land in 2002 12 2002, while the average compensation from the collector was 7 199 1993 to 6 3 1994 which was not in accordance with the law which would determine the fair compensation. The average price of will not appear. The ability to secure a property was to look at the location, and the average could not be relied solely on the determination of the value of the property for the purpose of compensation. The acquired land was located nearby. The metal road and the sale price around it was higher than what was estimated by the LA owners to deposit, not the ND-obtained market compensation, but the compensation, which was always higher than the market value. The average sale price of previous dates cannot be relied upon in the amount examined in the award; therefore, the compensation was not according to the landowners referee court's valid review and the compensation was acquired by the date of occupation. The fixed land rate was fixed. The required acquisition compensation should be paid at the rate of 25 of if the company acquires the land for Wapda. For what land was acquired, the company was and the owners of the land were entitled to compulsory acquisition compensation up to 25 of instead of 15 instead, no weakness was identified in the involuntary decision; The range was rejected with modification.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
