Sections 417 (2A) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 337A (ii), 34 and 109 of the Shijaja First Muddah, joint intentions, were reported to the police on appeal against acquittal. About the shootings by the victim with which he suffered injuries to his right thigh and only the victim of the shooting was complaining, while the appellant after the alleged shootings, when the complaint The complainant and the accused persons were present when the appellant only ascertained the matter as a witness to the incident, nor the appellant was dismissed by the accused persons. Was not criminally intimidated, nor did it cause any further harm, and no one was reportedly harmed in the incident. The trial court was observed against the appellant, nor was he wrongfully deprived of any legal right, the matter always lies between the state, the victim and the accused, in case of murder The deceased's legal heritage had the right to take part in the prosecution. And to avoid that decision, if they find themselves inconvenienced by it, but only in cases of physical distress, no one else can withhold the trial court's decision in an appeal against evil, the victim's own, Or the state was specifically appealing against the situation being worse in the present case, neither by the state nor by the injured complainant, but by his brother, who is not just the appellant's bereaved person. The incident was a witness, the appeal filed by him could not be sustained. Which was rejected, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
