Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 409 of the Prevention of Corruption (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) guarantee of criminal trust by a public servant, grant of further investigative case against the accused Was that he was in charge. The Utility Store received some items in excess of the appropriate receipts from the Head Office, but when it was said that the goods were sold, the proceeds from its sale were not fully credited to the bank. And he was accused of misappropriating government money. For more than a year that the parties decided not to initiate criminal proceedings and to settle the account through mutual dialogue, such a factor strongly suggested that this was a matter of case / record correction. And the responsibility for intentional hunger cannot be clearly determined on the accused. Because the counsel for the utility store could not present a rule that would show that it is the duty of the accused, not the cashier, to submit to the bank. As this is one of the further investigations of the accused, where the bail cannot be denied lightly, the accused has been admitted to bail under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
