Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AMIR ALI versus STATE


In Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 497 and 498, the investigating officer found that the accused applicants were not present at the scene, which gave the material applicants the benefit of the doubt. Bail in case circumstances

1984 S C M R 521

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

AMIR ALI AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Appeal No. 137 of 1983 in Criminal Petition No. 327 of 1983, decided on 8th October, 1983.

(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 23‑6‑1983 passed in C. Misc. No. 2091 of 1983).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑ Art. 185 (3)‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 497 & 498 Bail, in murder case‑Finding of Investigation Officer that accused petitioners were not present at scene of occurrence found to be based on sufficient material‑Petitioners given benefit of doubt and granted bail in circumstances of case.

Malik Saeed Hassan, Advocate Supreme Court with Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

M. Tanvir Ahmad Khan, A. A.‑G. for the State.

Date of hearing : 8th October, 1983.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑

Amir Ali, Mokha and Mohabat petitioners are accused alongwith some others inter alia, under section 302, P. P. C. for the murder of Jamat Ali. They applied for bail before tile High Court and urged inter alia, that the A. S. P. who had investigated the case had found that the 3 petitioners were not present at the scene of the occurrence. Their co‑accused were granted bail but their application was refused by the High Court.

Feeling aggrieved they filed the present petition for leave to appeal.

2. We issued notice to the State. Mr. Tanvir Ahmad Khan, A. A.‑G. appearing for the State urged before us that the A. S. P. who investigated the case had found, after examining a large number of witnesses in the village, that the three petitioners were not present at the spot. He read out the relevant portions of the A. S. P's. report to us.

3. We, therefore, convert this petition into appeal and proceed to dispose it of as such.

4. We feel that in this case the view expressed by the A. S. P., that the petitioners were not present at the spot, is based on sufficient material. As such we are of the view that in this case the benefit of doubt arising from the A. S. P's. report must go to the petitioners even at the bail stage. They are, therefore, granted bail in the sum of Rs. 30,000 each with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Jaranwala.

S. Q. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.