Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD NAZIR versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 497/498 FA declared that the accused causing the death of his head was not a blow. went. 1R and medical evidence which shows that the deceased died of head injuries Other co-accused accepted TD bail by High Court

1984 S C M R 206

Present : S. A. Nusrat and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ

MUHAMMAD NAZIR‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 98 of 1983, decided on 7th May, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, dated 18‑1‑1983, passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 61/13/83).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497/498‑No blow attributed to accused causing death of deceased‑‑Co‑accused charged for dealing blows to deceased on his head in F. 1. R and medical evidence showing that deceased died of head injuries‑Other co‑accused admitted td bail by High Court Accused admitted to bail in circumstances.

Taj M. Khan Langah, Advocate Supreme Court and R. Maqbool A. Qadri, advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

M. M. Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Date of hearing : 7th May. 1983.

ORDER

MIAN BURHANUDDIN KHAN, J.‑

The petitioner, along with 4 other accused, was charged for the murder of Ajayab Khan deceased. He applied for bail to the Additional Sessions Judge, Vehari which was rejected by order dated 1‑9‑1982. He then applied for bail to the Lahore High Court which was again rejected vide impugned order dated 18‑1‑1983.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that no blow had been attributed to the petitioner causing the death of the deceased. In the F. I. R. the co‑accused of the petitioner have been charged for dealing blows to the deceased on his head and the medical evidence shows that the deceased died of the head injuries, and as such the petitioner cannot be held responsible for causing the fatal injuries to the deceased that the other co‑accused Sultan has been admitted to bail by the learned High Court vide order dated 20‑12‑1982. Notice was issued to the Advocate‑General vide order dated 27‑4‑1983. We admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs. 20,00 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C./Duty Magistrate, Mailsi.

M. Z. M. Petition accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Chilas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.