Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1245 of 1983, decided on 22nd October, 1983.
(On appeal from the judgment and order, dated l0th October, 1983 of the Lahore High Court Lahore, in Writ Petition No. 3350 of 1183).
---Art. 185(3)‑West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13‑Ejectment on ground of personal need of landlord Concurrent findings of Courts below‑Judgment of High Court not suffering from any legal error or any error of principle‑Tenant running business in part of premises‑Tenant allowed two months' time to deliver vacant possession of premises to landlord‑Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
Shahid Hussain Qadri, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Muhammad Aslam Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Ch. Muhammad Bakhsh, Advocate Supreme court for Respondents.
Date of hearing : 22nd October, 1983.
This petition is directed against the judgment of the Lahore High Court dated 10‑10‑19753 challenging the dismissal of petitioner's Writ Petition (W. P. No. 3350 of 1983) directed against the order of the Rent Controller and upheld by the Additional District Judge, allowing the respondent‑landlord's petition for ejectment of the petitioner on the ground of personal need.
After hearing Mr. Shahid Hussain Qadri, learned counsel for the' petitioner and Ch. Muhammad Bakhsh for respondent No. It we are satisfied that the judgment of the High Court doers not require any interference as it does not suffer from any legal error or any error of principle.
However as the petitioner has teen running some business in a part of the premises. we will allow him two months' time to deliver vacant possession of the premises in his possession to the respondent. The petitioner is present in the Court and has given an undertaking before us that he will deliver posses sion of the premises to the respondent peacefully and without forcing him to have recourse to execution proceedings.
This petition, subject to the above directions, stands dismissed.
M. Z. M. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer