Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Shariat Appeal No. K‑1 of 1983, decided on 2nd November, 1983.
‑‑‑ Art. 203‑F‑Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XXIII, para. 2‑Time barred appeal‑Appellant not appearing on date fixed‑Appeal already adjourned one, having been fixed during last week‑No arrangements made by appellant not even with regard to explanation for condoning delay beyond period of limitation in filing appeal‑‑Telegram sent by appellant not disclosing sufficient cause for condoning delay nor applica tion made for condonation of delay‑Appeal dismissed as time‑barred in circumstances.
Nemo for Appellant.
The appellant lm not appeared. He has sent a telegram for adjournment. This is already an adjourned appeal as the same was fixed for hearing during the last week. No arrangement has been made by the appellant not even with regard to the explanation for condoning the delay beyond the period of limitation in filing this appeal. The telegram at page 56 of the Paper Book does not disclose sufficient cause for condoning the delay nor in fact any application has been made for condonation. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as time‑barred.
M. Z. M. Appeal dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer