Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL SHAKOOR versus WAHID HUSSAIN


Article 185 (3) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), the pre-emption section 15 of the notice against service to tenants, will be appealed to consider these questions whether the reader and the presiding Is the note recorded by the officer workable? The fact of service of notice to the tenant so as to give power to the presiding officer at a later date in which the tenant had no notice of proceedings against the ex-party from the tenants even though the order / diary by the reader in the matter of rent. The process of recording was in accordance with applicable law and practice of rent. During this time, the withdrawal order should not be put into practice

1984 S C M R 174

Present : Muhammad Haleem, Actg. C. J., Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

ABDUL SHAKOOR‑Petitioner

Versus

Syed WAHID HUSSAIN‑Respondent

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑246 of 1983, decided on 24th August, 1983.

(On appeal against the judgment of Sind High Court at Karachi, dated 20th April, 1983 in First Rent Appeal No. 297 of 1981).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑--

‑‑ Art. 185(3)‑Sind Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979), S. 15‑Ex parte decree of ejectment against tenant‑Service of notice on tenant‑Leave to appeal granted to consider questions whether a note recorded by Reader and not Presiding Officer was sufficient to effectuate fact of service of notice on tenant so as to authorize Presiding Officer on subsequent date of which tenant had no notice to proceed against tenant ex parte‑Whether practice of recording orders/ diaries by Reader in rent cases was in accordance with law and practice applicable to rent proceedings‑Order of ejectment ordered not to be executed in the meanwhile.

Anwar Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record/Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.

M. Mustafa, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

Date of hearing : 24th August, 1983.

ORDER

SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑

Leave to appeal is granted to the tenant against whom an ex parse decree of ejectment was passed and there was refusal to set it aside, to examine the following questions of law :‑

(1) Whether a note dated 21‑3‑1981 recorded by the Reader and not the Presiding Officer was sufficient to effectuate the fact of service of notice on the tenant so as to authorize the Presiding Officer on a subsequent date 4‑4‑1981 of which the tenant had no notice, to proceed against the tenant ex parte.

(2) Whether the practice of recording orders/diaries by the Reader in rent cases is in accordance with the law and practice applicable to the proceedings.

Security in the sum of Rs. 2,500. The ejectment order not to be executed in the mean while.

At the hearing the record of the proceedings before the Rent Controller be made available.

M. Z. M. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Kohistan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.