Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NISAR ALIAS NISARI versus GOVT. OF PAKISTAN


Article 203F (l) Read with Supreme Court Rules, 1980, OV, r 3 OV, r 1 (6) of the Supreme Court filed under the Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Article 15 Article 203F (1) Acquisition of Shariah Appeal Directly), Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Appellant prosecuted, sentenced and sentenced by the Special Military Court of Appeal. His Supreme Court was assured that he was served by military courts. There was no intention to challenge, be punished, neither the provisions or the effect or the presidential order of any martial law regulation or martial law order were involved in the matter nor would they be brought under appeal. Ndh clear rules or guidelines that do not arrange any compromise to take notice of them, including the criminal code, the law on executions in 1898 and the prison manual. Attempts to assassinate the murder cases, against the orders of Islam, which are present in the Supreme Court of Qur'an and such an explanation, to be enjoyed by the Registrar of the Directive

P L D 1984 Supreme Court 373

(Shat fat Bench]

Present : Justice Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Chairman, Nasim Hasan Shah, Shafiur Rahman, Pir Muhammad Karam Shah and Maulana Muhammad Taqi Usmani, JJ

NISAR alias NISARI AND ANOTHER---Appellants versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 2 others-Respondents

Shariat Miscellaneous Nos. 68-R and 69-R of 1984, decided on 4th April, 1;984.

(On appeal against the Order of Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan, dated 9th January, 1984 in Sharait Petition No. 4/1 of 1983).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

-- Art. 203-F(l) - Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. V, r. 3 read with O. V, r. 1(6) - Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 15Entertainment of direct Shariat appeal by Supreme Court filed under Art. 203-F(1), Constitution of Pakistan (1973) - Appellant tried, convicted and sentenced by Special Military Court-Appellant assuring Supreme Court that he had no intention of challenging, conviction recorded by Military Courts, nor provisions or effect of any Martial Law Regulation or Martial Law Order or Presidential Order were involved in case nor they will be brought under discussion-Appellant clarifying that law relating to execution of death in Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Rules or directions including Jail Manual in so far as they do not make provision for taking note of compromise in murder cases, were sought to be declared against injunctions of Islam as contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah-Supreme Court on such clarification regarding point to be raised, directed Registrar of the Court to entertain appeal.

Zahir Shah v. The State Shariat Petition No. 4-P of 1981 ref.

Saeed Beg, Advocate Supreme Court and Jan Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record (absent) for Appellants.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 4th April, 1984.

JUDGEMENT

JUSTICE MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, CHAIRMAN.-These two Miscellaneous Appeals under Order V, rule 3 read with Order V, rule 1(6) of the Supreme Court Rules are directed against the refusal, dated 8-2-1984 of the Registrar of this Court to entertain two direct Shariat Appeals filed under Article 203-F-1 on the following ground ;

"The appellants were tried, convicted and sentenced by a Special Military Court. Therefore, the appeal is not entertainable under the provisions of the Provisional Constitution Order, 1981. Returned to Mr. Jan Muhammad Khan, A. O. R."

When questioned in this behalf learned counsel explained that the appellants had no intention of challenging the conviction recorded by the Military Courts, nor the provisions or effect of any M. L. R. or M. L. O. or P. O. are involved in the case. Nor they will be brought under discussion. He has explained that the law relating to execution of death in the Cr. P. C. and the rules/directions including the Jail Manual insofar as they do not make provision for taking note of the compromise in murder cases, were sought to be declared against the injunctions of (slam as contained in the Qur'an and Sunnah. He has also relied on the precedent case of Zahir Shah v. The State (Shariat Petition No. 4-P of 1981), decided by the Federal Shariat Court under Article 203-D of the Constitution on 6-4-1982.

After the clarification made by the learned counsel regarding the point to be raised in the appeals, the grounds mentioned by Registrar for not entertaining the appeal do not exist any more.

These appeals are allowed with the direction that the original appeal returned earlier should be entertained and registered.

Appeal allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.