Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Criminal Petition No.9‑R of 1984, decided on 21st March, 1984.
(From the order dated 10‑3‑1984 of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, passed in Criminal Misc. No. 1 of 1984 in Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 1984).
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑
‑‑‑S.426‑‑Suspension of sentence‑‑High Court refusing to suspend sentence of accused‑petitioner pending disposal of his appeal‑‑No good grounds shown for interference with interlocutory order passed by High Court‑‑Petition dismissed.
Sardar Muhammad Ishaque Khan, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Khan
Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Nemo for the State
Date of hearing: 21st March, 1984.
The petitioner's grievance is against the refusal by the Lahore High Court to suspend his sentence under section 426, Cr.P.C. pending disposal of his appeal. The refusal was on the ground that the contentions raised by the petitioner's counsel needed deeper appreciation of evidence, which could not be done at that stage.
2. After hearing learned counsel, we are not satisfied that there are good grounds to interfere with the interlocutory order passed by the High Court. The petition is dismissed.
S. Q. Petition dismissed.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer