Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Miscellaneous Petitions Nos. 609/R and 610/R of 1983, decided on 12th December, 1983.
Supreme Court Rules, 1980‑
‑‑‑ XIV_ r.6‑‑Review‑‑Petition against dismissal of review petition‑‑ Counsel who argued case not present in Court‑‑Petition dismissed for non‑compliance of relevant rules. ‑‑[Review by Supreme Court].
Ch. Ghulam Mujtaba, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Advocate Supreme Court (absent) for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 12th December, 1983.
‑‑ These petitions are directed against the dismissal of petitioners' Criminal Review Petitions Nos. 22/81 and 54/81, by an order dated 2‑7‑1983. This order reads as follows:‑
"Rule 6 of Order XVI of Supreme Court Rules, 1980 has not been complied with as the learned counsel who argued the case is not present in the Court. The review petitions are accordingly dismissed. "
2. Unfortunately, even in the present petitions the counsel who argued the case is not present in the Court. We are, therefore, A constrained to dismiss the same for non‑compliance with the relevant) rules.
S. Q. Petitions dismissed
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer