Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SULTAN AHMAD versus MALIK AMAN


Article 185 (3) read with Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 497 and 498 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), cancellation of bail for the accused who failed to make arrangements in the Supreme Court of 307, Sessions Judge and District It was approved by the magistrate. However, the canceled order will not bar respondents from applying for a fresh bail before the session court.
1984 S C M R 1476

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M.S.H. Quraishi, JJ

SULTAN AHMAD‑‑Petitioner

versus

MALIK AMAN and another‑‑Respondents

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.184‑R of 1982, decided on 20th February, 1984.

(On appeal from the judgment of Peshawar High Court dated 11‑12‑1982 in Cr.M.No. 148 of 1982).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss.497 & 498 read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.307‑‑Bail‑‑Cancellation of‑‑Accused respondent failing to make arrangement in Supreme Court‑‑Bail granted to him by Sessions Judge and District Magistrate cancelled‑‑Order, however, not to be bar to respondent for making fresh petition for bail before Sessions Court.

Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent

Shakirullah, Advocate Supreme Court for the State.

Date of hearing: 20th February, 1984.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH,

J.

‑‑ This appeal through special leave of this Court is directed against the order, dated 12‑9‑1982 whereby bail was granted to the respondent No.l (Malik Aman) in a case purported to be under section 307, P.P.C. and also the order, dated 11‑12‑1982 of the Peshawar High Court refusing to cancel the same.

The said accused /respondent has not appeared despite service through bailable warrants.

We are not inclined to cancel the bail on merits of the case in his absence. Hut after hearing both the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State, the bail granted to him by the learned Sessions Judge A on 12‑9‑1982 as also granted by the District Magistrate, Mansehra on 25‑1‑1984 under orders of this Court, is cancelled for his failure to make arrangement for appearance in this Court.

This order shall, however, not bar the said respondent making fresh petition for bail before the Sessions Court; which shall be decided on its own merits, in accordance with the law as amended up‑to‑date.

S. Q. Bail cancelled.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocates from Sanjwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.