Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHABBAT ALI versus STATE


Article 185 (3) of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), sections 10 and 11 failed to die in the allotment granted in favor of the respondent by the applicant and the usual method of review, in the same case. May not be allowed to protest again at. Refusing to appeal another time of law and changing the basis of the attack
1984 S C M R 1388

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

MUHABBAT ALI‑‑Petitioner

versus

SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, BAHAWALPUR

DIVISION, BAHAWALPUR and others‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition No.472 of 1979, decided on 13th April, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment, dated 17‑3‑1979 of the Lahore High Court in Writ Petition No.96‑R of 1979).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

‑‑‑Art.185(3)‑‑Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss.10 & 11‑‑Petitioner failing to shake allotment made in favour of respondents by resort to normal remedy of appeal and revision‑‑Held, could not be permitted to re‑agitate same matter by invoking another provision of law and changing ground of attack‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Syed Muhammad Ali Zaidi, Advocate Supreme Court and Inayat Hussain, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Shahzad Jahangir, Senior Advocate Supreme Court for Respondents. Date of hearing: 13th April, 1983.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.‑‑

The petitioner challenged the propriety and legality of the allotment made in favour of Ali Muhammad (now dead and represented by his legal representatives) on the grounds, inter‑alia, that he had a preferential claim to the allotment by filing an appeal and revision before the Settlement authorities. Having failed therein he after some time, challenged the allotment through a Mukhbari application under sections 10 and 11 of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, urging a different ground for challenging the allotment in his favour Here too, he was unsuccessful. His Writ Petition even having failed hence this petition.

This petition is liable to dismissal on the short ground that having failed to shake the allotment made in favour of the respondents by resort to the normal remedy of appeal and revision, he could not be permitted to re‑agitate the same matter, by invoking another provision of law and changing his ground of attack. Dismissed.

S, Q, Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Ahmadpur East lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.