Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Civil Petition for Special for Leave to appeal No 550‑R of 1983, decided on 13th November, 1983.
(On appeal from the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 11‑5‑1983 in Appeal No. 137(R) of 1981).
‑‑--Art. 212(3)‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4‑Civil service‑Promotion‑Questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion‑Distinguishable from questions of prospects of promotion‑No question of law of public importance involved in case‑Leave to appeal refused.‑[Civil service].
Dr. Ehsan‑ul‑Haq v. The Province of Punjab arid others 1980 S C M R 972 ref.
Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.
Respondent in person.
Date of hearing : 13th November, 1983.
Leave to appeal has been sought from judgment, dated 11‑5‑1983 of the Central Service Tribunal; whereby the respondent's service appeal was allowed.
Learned Deputy Attorney‑General has, relying on Dr. Ehsan‑ul‑Haq v. The Province of Punjab and others (1980 S C M R 972), contended that the Tribunal could not interfere with the orders of promotion passed by the concerned authority, as no appeal in this behalf was competent.
It is not denied that questions of eligibility and consideration for promotion are distinguishable from those of prospects of promotion. As contended by the learned Deputy Attorney‑General the law in this behalf has already been declared by this Court that being so no question or any other question of law of public importance is involved in this case. It is thus not a fit case for grant of leave to appeal under Article 212 of the Constitution.
S.Q. Leave refused.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer