Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A counterinsumer medical superintendent retired on the power of a medical report to prove that he was over 60 years old and suffering from seniors' duty, with no counter medical certificate produced. That he had not reached the age of instability and he was not. Sick-job-like retirement for work, retirement, rightly ordered
1984 P L C 1520

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

KHAN MUHAMMAD

versus

THF CHIEF CORPORATION OFFICER, MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION, MULTAN

Appeal No. MN‑194 of 1982, decided on 21st April, 1982.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑---

--‑‑S. 25‑A‑Reinstatement‑Workman retired on strength of medical report of Medical Superintendent that he was more than 60 years and suffering from Senial Debility ‑ No‑ counter‑medical certificate produced to show that he has not reached age of superannuation and that he was not suffering from disease as reported Retirement of workman, held, rightly ordered.

Anwarul Hassan Khan 8hatti for Appellant.

Date of hearing :19th April, 1982.

ORDER

This appeal arises from the decision, dated 28th February, 1982 passed by the Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 9, Multan whereby the Grievance petition of the appellant was dismissed for his reinstatement.

2. The appellant was a Baildar and after serving for 30 years was retired on 4th May, 1980 on the strength of Medical Report of the Medical Superintendent which was to the effect that he was of the age of more than 60 years, that he was suffering from Senial Debility. No counter‑Medical Certificate was produced by the appellant to show that he has not yet reached the age of supperannuation and that he was not suffering from the disease as reported by the Medical Superintendent in his Certificate. In these circumstances the appellant was rightly retired and his grievance peti tion was rightly dismissed. There is no force in the appeal which is dismissed in limine.

M. Y. M.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Phalia lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.