Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 8st Request, Employee Grant, President Union, moved to another station without permission from Registrar with which the application for registration of the Union is pending and thus does not effectively comply with the request. On the selection of a new such employee, the president will have to suffer in terms of money, thus the balance of the facility was in his favor, the employee has a first case for approval of stay, to deny the stay request. Order placed aside

1984 P L C 1504

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

INAYATULLAH ROCKET

versus

MANAGING DIRECTOR, UTILITY STORES CORPORATION,

ISLAMABAD AND ANOTHER

Revision Petition No. FD-35 of 1984,,decided on 27th May, 1984.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)----

-- S.8-A-Stay application, grant of-Employee, President of Union, transferred to other station without getting permission from Registrar with whom application for registration of Union pending and thus would not be able to pursue application effectively-Such employee on election of new President would be suffering loss in terms of money, thus balance of convenience was in his favour-Employee, held, has a prima facie case for grant of stay Order of dismissal of stay application set aside.

Petitioner in person.

Ehsan Ali Sheikh for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 22nd May, 1984.

JUDGMENT

The order, dated 30th January, 1984 whereby the stay application of the petitioner was dismissed is informed to have been wrongly passed. The prayer is that this Tribunal may exercise its suo motu revisional powers to set aside the impugned order.

2. The petitioner was transferred to Lahore vide order, dated 15th December, 1983 without getting permission from the Registrar with whom the application of the petitioner for the registration of the Union of which he is alleged to be the President, is alleged to be pending. Information o it is alleged to have been given to the respondents on 10th December, 1983 vide letter copy marked B'. The copy of the application for registration of the Union is marked A'. These documents show that the petitioner has a prima facie case. Getting of permission from the Registrar is necessary A according to section 8-A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Balance of convenience also goes in favour of the petitioner and the Union. If transfer is not stayed, the petitioner will not be able to pursue the application for registration of the Union effectively. He shall have to go to Faisalabad to pursue the application. If on account of his transfer another President is elected, the petitioner will cease to remain as President and thus will suffer a loss that cannot be compensated in terms of money. He thus has

3. As a result, the impugned order dismissing the stay application is, set aside and implementation of the transfer order is stayed. If it has been implemented, its operation is suspended with a direction that the petitioner should be put back on duty at Faisalabad. This order will remain effective till the final decision of the main grievance petition pending before the learned lower Court.

M. Y. M.

Petition allowed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.