Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

versus


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 (d) and 38 (3) No allegation of practicing unfair labor exchange does not fall within the scope of the complaint of transfer section 15 (d) due to the activities of any trade union, in the circumstances, holding Is rightly denied by the Labor Court

1984 P L C 1293

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present : Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF RATHORE

versus

G. H. BOKHARI, ASSISTANT ENGINEER PHONES, GUJRAT AND ANOTHER

Appeal No. GA-122 of 1984, decided on 30th April, 1984.

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)---

--- Ss. 15(d) & 38(3)-Transfer-No allegation of unfair labour practice-Transfer not on account of any trade Union activities Does not fall within ambit of S. 15(d)-Complaint, in circumstances, held, rightly dismissed by Labour Court.

Appellant in person.

Date of hearing : 25th April, 1984.

JUDGMENT

The appeal captioned above arises from the order, dated 15th March, 1984 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Punjab Labour Court No. 7, Gujranwala, whereby the complaint of the appellant brought under sec tion 15(d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 was dismissed. The complaint always is the basic document on which the whole structure is to be raised. But in the complaint it is not mentioned that on account of any trade Union activities, the appellant was transferred. Section 15(d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance,.1969 reads as under :-

15(d) dismiss, discharge or remove from employment or transfer or threaten to dismiss, discharge or remove from employment or transfer a workman or injure him in respect of his employment by reason that the workman :-

(i) is or proposes to become, or seeks to persuade any other person to become, a member or officer of a trade union, or

(ii) participates in the promotion, formation or activities of a trade union-

It was necessary to disclose in the complaint that either the appellant wanted to become, or persuaded any other person to become, a member or office holder of a trade union, or that he participated in the promotion, forma tion or activities of a trade union. The case of the appellant is that the Divisional Engineer Telegraphs and Mr. G. H. Bokhari had conspired against him. No reason has been given why a conspiracy was made against him. Since there is no allegation of unfair labour practice, it cannot be l said that the transfer of the appellant falls in section 15(d) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The complaint was rightly dismissed.

2. As a result, the appeal is dismissed in limine.

A. E. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Vehari lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.