Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Application No. LBR‑344 of 1982, decided on 19th January, 1983.
‑‑ S. 38 (3a)‑Revision‑Suo motu power of Appellate Tribunal -No right to a party to invoke such jurisdiction‑Petition for revision dismissed in default‑Party not entitled to ask for restoration of such petition.
Petitioner in person.
Date of hearing : 16th January, 1983.
This is an application for the restoration of revision petition dismissed in default on 28th November, 1982. No statutory right has been given for bringing revision petition. Only the appellate tribunal has been invested with the power of supervision under section 38 (3‑a) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance to call for the record of any case from the Labour Courts working under its jurisdiction to see the cor rectness and propriety of the orders passed by them. Revision petition was lodged simply to point out to the Tribunal that an illegal and improper order has been passed. When such petitions are presented and are dismissed in default, there is no right to get it restored. When there is no such right to challenge an order in revision, there can exist no right to ask for the restoration of any such petition. The petition for restoration, therefore, is rejected.
A. E.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer