Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus WAPDA


West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 10 B (v) applies to conditions where the employer fails to insure employees under the insurance scheme, the deceased employees are insured and legal Group insurance is paid to nominees without the commitment of the heirs. circumstances s compensation, in the circumstances, denied appropriate interference

1984 P L C 658

[Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab]

Present: Muhammad Abdul Ghafoor Khan Lodhi, Appellate Tribunal

MUHAMMAD IQBAL

versus

WAPDA AND ANOTHER

Appeal No. FD‑8 of 1982, heard on 2nd May, 1982.

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968)‑

‑‑S. O. 10‑B (v)‑Provisions applicable where employer failed to get employees insured under group insurance scheme‑Deceased workman insured and amount of group insurance paid to nominee without determination of legal heirs‑Commissioner Workmen's Compensation, in circumstances, held, rightly refused interference.

Sadiq Ali Hashmi for Appellant.

Date of hearing : 2nd May, 1982.

JUDGMENT

This appeal arises from the decision, dated 31st January, 1982 passed by the learned Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Faisalabad, whereby he dismissed the application of the appellant for the reason that as WAPDA had paid the amount of group insurance, pay, gratuity etc., to the widow of the deceased out of Court, the necessity of making any interference was not felt. The petition was dismissed leaving the appellant to seek remedy from the civil Court, if he was so advised.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant has said that in the present case the deceased had been insured under the group insurance scheme. From the impugned order also it appears that the deceased had been insured and the amount of group insurance had been paid to the nominee without determi nation of the legal heirs. Standing Order 10‑B of Standing Orders Ordinance, 1968 applies where the employer has failed to get the employee concerned insured under the group insurance scheme and in such cases petition lies to the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation under clause (v) of the said Standing Order. But in cases where the deceased had been duly, insured by the employer under the group insurance scheme, Standing Order 10‑B is not applicable and thus the Commissioner had no jurisdic tion. In these circumstances the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation rightly refused to interfere although on different grounds. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed in limine.

A. E.

Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Kashmir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.