Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

JAVAID versus THE STATE


Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), allegedly hurt with a knife on the back of a section 302 bail, and fired revolver shots after the incident, was convicted and sentenced fifteen months later. Was arrested. The prisoner is not entitled to bail under the circumstances

P L D 1984 Lahore 34

Before ljaz Nisar, J

JAVAID-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 353-B of 1983, decided on 15th October, 1983.

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)----

S. 307-Intention-Conduct, locale of injury and weapon used, held, relevant considerations for determining intent of accused not seeing nature of injury alone.

(b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)----

-- S. 497-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Bail-Accused allegedly causing injury with chhuri on back of complainant after making an abortive attempt on his life by firing revolver shots-Absconding after occurrence, declared proclaimed offender and arrested after fifteen months---Accused, held, not entitled to bail in circumstances.

Tariq Azam Choudhri for Petitioner.

Mukhtar Hussain for the State

Date of hearing: 15th October, 1983.

ORDER

The petitioner stands charged under section 307, P. P. C. It is alleged that on 24-5-1982 he ineffectively fired at Mumtaz with a revolver and thereafter he assaulted him with a churri. The blow landed on the left side of the back of chest.

2. The motive for the offence was that the petitioner's elder brother had been murdered about 5/6 years before the occurrence in which father of the complainant was challaned and acquitted. Additionally complainant's father stands convicted for causing injuries to the petitioner's father.

3. Bail is urged on the ground that the case is based on false allegations due to enmity, that soon after coming to know of the registration of the .case the petitioner surrendered and it is wrong to allege that he was an absconder and lastly that the injury attributed to him has been. declared to be simple in nature.

4. Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the bail. He states that the petitioner is named in the F. I. R. with a specific role and remained absconding for nearly 15 months and was declared a proclaimed offender.

5. The conduct, locale of the injury and the weapon used are the relevant considerations for determining the intent of the accused. and not seeing the nature of the injury alone. In the instant case, the petitioner is alleged to have caused injury with chhuri on the back of the complainant after making an abortive attempt on his life by firing revolver shots. Furthermore, the petitioner is alleged to have absconded after the occurrence and was declared a proclaimed offender and was arrested about 15 months after the occurrence. In these circumstances, I do not consider him entitled to bail a this stage and accordingly dismiss his application.

Bail refused,

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
inheritance advocates near Kotli Loharan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.