Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL REHMAN versus STATE


Criminal Code (CR PC) section 497 (2) read with panel code (XLV of 1860), 5 302 bail, [murder case] grant [applicant] driving tractor, in which his co-accused was, and his Injury to the victim, unnecessary behavior due to injury to the accompanying accused: An investigation case involving under Section 497 (2) of the CRPC, in circumstances

1984 P Cr. L J 2543

[Lahore]

Before Kamal Mustafa Bokhari, J

ABDUL RE HMAN--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 777-B of 1983, decided on 3rd July, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497(2) read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), 5.302--Bail, grant of--[Murder-case]--Petitioner driving tractor, carrying his co-accused, and his joining co-accused for causing injuries to one person with hatchet, appearing unnecessary--Held: A case of further inquiry as covered by S.497(2) of Cr.P.C., in circumstances.

Taj Muhammad Khan Langha for Petitioner.

Muhammad Khalid Alvi for the State.

Abdul Sattar Goraya for Complainant.

Date of hearing: 3rd July, 1983.

ORDER

Petitioner alongwith four others is accused of offence under sections 302/307//149 and 148, P.P.C. It is alleged that petitioner was driving a tractor in which he carried his co-accused and after stopping the tractor Barkhurdar, his co-accused, successively fired shots from a pistol and the petitioner with three other co-accused carrying a hatchet each caused as many as 22 hatchet injuries to Muhammad Shafi deceased who died on account of the injuries suffered by him. The motive given is previous murder in which the accused party was the complainant and petitioner was a prosecution witness.

2. It has been argued that according to the allegations petitioner was driving a tractor and was primarily concerned with it. It has been further submitted that no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner and according to the allegations four accused including the petitioner generally caused hatchet blows to the deceased. The grant of bail has been opposed by learned counsel for the State and for the complainant. It has been submitted that the trial of the case is going to commence on 9-7-1983, that petitioner is alleged to have caused injury to the deceased and the medical evidence supports it.

3. According to the allegations petitioner was driving the tractor and it was unnecessary for him to join his three co-accused for causing injuries to one person with hatchets. The case against the petitioner is of further inquiry covered by section 497(2), Cr.P.C. He is allowed bail subject to his furnishing security in the sum of Rs.25,000 (Rupees twenty five thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/ Duty Magistrate, Vehari.

S. G. D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Fort Abbas lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.