Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MURAD versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497/498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 (2), 13, 14 and 18 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Penalties of Section 326 Adultery If the unusual delay in issuing the challan invoice is not offered at an early date then the accused will be justified in seeking bail.

1984 P Cr. L J 2472 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

MUHAMMAD MURAD--Petitioner

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 821-B of 1983/BWP, decided on 13th September, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497/498--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10(2), 13, 14 & 18--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.326--Bail- Offence of Zina--Inordinate delay occurring in submission of challan- Challan when not submitted at an early date accused would be justified in asking for bail--Bail granted.

Malik Farrukh Mahmood for Petitioner.

M.A. Hamid for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Muhammad Murad petitioner in a case under sections 10 (2), 13, 14, 18 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979 read with section 326 P P.C., registered at P.S. Khairpur, vide F.I.R. No.51/83, dated 25th April, 1983.

2. Learned counsel submits that although the petitioner was arrested on 3rd May, 1983 yet the challan has not been submitted so far. As against this the learned counsel for the State has opposed this application. He explains that the delay in the submission of the chaliar, is due to the fact that the co-accused are yet to be arrested.

3. After hearing the learned counsel I find that although the petitioner was arrested on 3rd, May, 1983 and about 41 months have passed yet the challan has not been submitted. I am of the view that an accused person can as a matter of right demand that the challan should be submitted at an early date and in case the challan is not submitted without any fault on his part, he would be justified in asking for bail.

Without making any expression lest it may prejudice the merits o: the case, I am inclined to admit the petitioner to bail on the ground of inordinate delay in the submission of challan. He stall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 10 000 with one surety in' the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C./Duty Magistrate, Bahwalpur. It would however, be open to the complainant/State to move for cancellation of bail after the submission of the challan, if so advised.

M. Y. H. Bail Granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.