Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ALAM SHAH versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 read with Section Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Bail, (Grant of Witness Case) in its statements under Section 164 supporting the prosecution of the complainant Two of the three witnesses, including not doing so, were involved. , CCP case, detention, one of the further investigative applicants allowed bail in the circumstances
1984 P Cr. L J 2101

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

ALAM SHAH AND ANOTHER-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 166/11 of 1982, decided on 9th March, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

-- S. 497 read with Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Bail, grant of -- (Murder case) - Two out of three alleged eye-witnesses, including complainant not supporting prosecution case in their statements recorded under S. 164, Cr. P. C.--Matter, -held, one of further inquiry-Petitioners allowed bail, in circumstances.

A M. Sultan Alam for Petitioner.

Ch. Nazir Ahmad for the State.

Date of hearing: 9th March, 1982.

JUDGMENT

Petitioners, Alam Shah and Willayat Shah have moved this petition for bail in a case under section 302/324/452/34, P. P. C., registered at P. S. Kabirwala, vide F. I. R. No. 98. dated 27th April, 1981.

The prosecution case is that the petitioners in furtherance of their common intention caused the death of Muhammad Ramzan on 25th April, 1981 in the area of Chak No. 18/A. H. of P. S. Kabirwala. As for the petitioners, it is alleged that Alam Shah while armed with a knife and Walayat Shah with spear caused injuries to Muhammad Ramzan, who subsequently succumbed to the same.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant and Ahmad Bakhsh, eye-witnesses, in their statements recorded under section 164 have exonerated the petitioners. Before me, Muhammad Yousaf and Ahmad Bakhsh have owned their statement under section 164, Cr. P. C. As against this, learned counsel for the State has opposed this application.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, I find that out of three alleged eye-witnesses two eye-witnesses including the com plainant, who is first cousin of the deceased, and Ahmed Bakhsh P. W. have not supported the prosecution case in their statements recorded under section 164 Cr. P. C. (certified copies placed on the record) and, as such, A the mater requires further inquiry. The petitioners are, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 (rupees twenty thousand) each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Kabirwalas

S. G. D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Nowshero Feroz lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.