Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NOORAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Section 497/498 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16 guaranteed that a previous order of dissolution of the accused (woman) was obtained. He was separated for this reason. Her husband is marrying another man Question whether the order to dissolve with the first husband has already been laid, when he approves the question of further investigation, does the accused consider the other man his husband?

1984 P Cr. L J 1857 (1)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J

Mst. NOORAN-Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 422-B of 1983, decided on 13th April, 1983

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)-

--S. 497/498-Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Ss. 10 & 16-Bail - Accused (woman) obtaining ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage which got set aside ex parte by her husband-Woman marrying another man-Question whether accused believed other man to be her husband when she contracted marriage with him when decree of dissolution with first husband had already been set aside, held, a question of further inquiry-Bail granted.

M. M. Jamal for Petitioner.

Naeem Rashad for the State.

ORDER

Mst. Nooran obtained an ex parte decree of dissolution of marriage on 8-12-1982. Sadiq got this ex pane decree set aside on 20-12-198 which order itself was ex parte. Mst. Nooran is said to have married Riaz on 12-3-1983. The question for determination will be whether on 12-3-1983 when the decree of dissolution was/has already been set aside ex parte, she believed Riaz her co-accused to be her husband or not. This is a question of further inquiry. The petitioner is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 (Rupees ten thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Mailsi.

M. Y. H. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law websites from Rohri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.