Application under Section 12 (2) and AXXIII, R3 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 and 8 of the suit for declaration and section 12 (2) for occupation, decree to compromise the CPC agreement The petitioner, who was simultaneously validated for separation, was not personally served in this case, nor was he aware of his lawlessness, nor did he know of any of the alleged solicitors. Was not the result of fraud or misrepresentation of the decree passed on the basis of the agreement and this was precisely the answer given by the courts below. It has failed to identify any kind of unlawful interference or irregularity under which the courts together decided that they had no jurisdiction over which they were exercising legal authority. Had neither worked nor worked illegally, nor with any illegal decision. And the orders of the following two courts were well established and did not require any interference. The High Court review was dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
