Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KALOO KHAN versus ZULFIQAR ALI


The Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and O VIII r 10 and Section 115 of the CPC's written statement, summarizing the applicant's suit, provided the courts with an opportunity to prove their case without any evidence. The applicant inadvertently condemned it. Settle down, subpoenaed, malicious material irregularities and illegal courts to handle his case Get more remand for trial by setting aside dismissal order

1984 M L D 418

[Lahore]

Before Abaid Ullah Khan, J

GUL HABIB--Petitioner

versus

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another--Respondents

Civil Revision No.1491 of 1982, decided on 4th July, 1984.

Civil procedure Code (V of 1908)--

---O.VIII r.10 & S.115--Dismissal of suit--Petitioner's suit summarily dismissed by Courts below without affording him an opportunity to prove his case by leading evidence--Petitioner practically condemned unheard when he was entitled to establish his case--Courts below, held, committed material irregularity and illegality in handling matter- Order of dismissal set aside and suit remanded for trial afresh.

Wasim Ahmad Bokhari for Petitioner.

Syed Muhammad Naqi for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 4th July, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This petition seeks revision of the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Judge, Lahore, dated the 23rd June, 1982, affirming in appeal dismissal of the petitioner's suit recorded by the learned Civil Judge, Lahore, on the 25th July, 1981. The petitioner challenged the validity of the order of the respondent dismissing him from service. The respondent did not file its written statement and the learned trial Civil Judge proceeded under Order VIII, rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure against it. However, without affording an opportunity to the petitioner to prove his case by leading evidence he dismissed his suit. The learned Additional District Judge by a short order endorsed the decision of the learned Civil Judge.

2. The treatment given by the learned Civil Judge and the Additional District Judge to the petitioner's case is less than fair and proper. The petitioner has been practically condemned unheard. His suit could not have been dismissed summarily. He was entitled to establish his case by production of evidence. Both the learned Courts below committee material irregularity and illegality in handling the matter before them. This petition is accordingly accepted, the impugned judgments and decrees of the learned trial and the first appellate Court are set aside and the suit is remanded to the learned District Judge, Lahore, who will entrust it for fresh trial and decision to a Civil Judge at Lahore with the directions that he will give it priority over other cases and dispose it of within two months.

M. Y. H. Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Rahwali lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.