Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MISBAH MUNIR versus ELECTION AUTHORITY, PUNJAB, LAHORE


Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Election Authority unit order was found to have irregularities in the elections at three polling stations, only to be held in three polling stations, exactly, under the jurisdiction of the Election Authority, No voting rights were presented. Voters who voted in other polling stations correctly

1984 C L C 543

[Lahore]

Before Abdul Shakurul Salam and Muhammad Aslam Mian, JJ

MISBAH MUNIR‑Petitioner

versus

ELECTION AUTHORITY, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 12 OTHERS -Respondent

Writ Petition No. 5308 of 1983, decided on 20th December, 1983.

Punjab Local Government Ordinance (VI of 1979)‑

‑‑‑ S. 17‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑Irregularities found in election at three polling. stations of a unit‑Order of Election Authority to hold election in such three polling station only, held, perfectly well within jurisdiction of Elec tion Authority‑No justification present to disfranchise voters who had rightly cast their votes in other polling stations.

Javaid Amin Khan Nayar for Appellant.

ORDER

ABDUL SHAKURUL SALAM, J.

‑Elections were held for Unit No. 30 of Lahore Municipal Corporation, Lahore. Applications were filed in which the petitioner joined, before the Election Authority under section 17 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance, 1979 wherein it was mainly alleged that the polling was not correctly held in the polling stations for the female voters. After report and hearing all the parties the learned Election Authority directed as prayed for the holding of fresh election for female voters. This is vide order, dated 5th December, 1983. This is challenged by the petitioner through the aforetitled Constitutional petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that once the Election Authority had come to the conclusion that the elections were not held in accordance with law, the entire election of the unit should have been set aside and not of polling stations for the female voters alone and fresh election ordered for them.

3. We are afraid that there is no force in this petition for the reasons that if the elections had been held in the other polling stations perfectly in accordance with law and there were only irregularities in the three polling stations for the female voters and fresh elections have been ordered therefor. the learned Election Authority had acted perfectly well within its jurisdiction to pass the impugned order. There was no justification to disfranchise the voters who had rightly cast their votes in the many male polling stations. This petition has no merits and is accordingly, dismissed in limine.

M. Z. M. Appeal dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Shahpur Chakar lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.