Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GULAB DIN versus IBRAHIM ALI KHAN


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Principles of Natural Justice Maxim Audi Ultiram Partium (will not be heard to anyone) Applicants did not work with the notice nor were they processed in the process affecting their rights, It was against the law and the rules of natural justice that a person was deprived of his life or property without the opportunity to hear such an order declared without legal judgment [Maxim]

1984 M L D 361

[Lahore]

Before Abdul Shakurul Salam, J

GULAB DIN and 4 others--Petitioners

versus

IBRAHIM ALI KHAN and 12 others--Respondents

Writ Petition No.1095 of 1977, decided on 19th June, 1984.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--

---Art.199--Principles of natural justice--Maxim audi alteram partem (No one shall be condemned unheard)--Petitioners not served with a notice nor impleaded in proceedings affecting their rights--Held, it was against law and rules of natural justice that a person was deprived of his life or property without being afforded an opportunity of hearing Such order declared without lawful authority.--[Maxim].

Muhammad Abdullah for Petitioners.

Sh.Abdul Aziz for Respondents Nos.1 to 3.

Muhammad Anwar Bhinder for Respondent No.4.

Nemo for Respondents Nos.5 to 13.

Date of hearing: 19th June, 1984.

JUDGMENT

This order will dispose of Writ Petitions No.1095/R/77, 1587/R/1977 and Writ Petition No.442/R/80 as these challenge the same order of the Additional Settlement Commissioner/ Chief Settlement Commissioner, Gujranwala, dated 25-4-1977.

2. Relevant facts for the disposal of these petitions are that the petitioners claim to be bona fide purchasers for value from one Meharban a displaced person from East Punjab (India) to whom allotment was made in various villages of Gujranwala: The allotment has been cancelled vide the impugned order.

3. The contention of the petitioners is that they have not been served with a notice or were not impleaded in the proceedings in which their rights have been affected. Learned counsel appearing on their, behalf have submitted that it is against law and rules of natural justice that somebody may be deprived of his life or property without being afforded an opportunity of hearing. This is, of course, the established law. In view of the above, the impugned order is declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The matter is remitted to the learned Member, Board of Revenue/Chief Settlement Commissioner for entrustment to a competent officer for fresh decision in accordance with law after notice to the parties concerned. In the circumstances, the parties shall bear their own costs.

M. B. A. Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Kot Ghulam Mohd lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.