Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HUSSAIN KHODAI versus STATE


Pakistan Penal Code Sections 419 and 471 read with Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Sections 435 and 439 deportation, the legal status of the accused, Iranian citizens, detected while traveling on fake travel documents, Section 419/471, p. The case was prosecuted under the PC. It is alone the argument that the accused did not charge any crime under the Immigration or Passport Act; the magistrate at the trial could not order his deportation after completing the sentence and such an order would be without jurisdiction. Was held, accordingly, the correct order of the trial court was amended.

1984 P Cr. L J 2621

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Razak A. Thahim. J

HUSSAIN KHODAI--Appellant

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Revision No. 119 of 1983, decided on 26th September, 1983.

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--

---Ss. 419 & 471 read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 435 & 439--Deportation, legality of--Accused, Irani nationals, detected travelling on forged travelling documents, tried and convicted for offences under S. 419/471, P.P.C. alone--Contention that accused not having been charged for any offence under Immigration or Passport Acts, trial Magistrate could not order their deportation after serving out sentence and such portion of order was without jurisdiction--Contention, held, correct--Order of trial Court amended accordingly.

Raja Qureshi for Appellant.

M. Memon for the State.

Date of hearing: 26th September, 1983.

JUDGMENT

This revision application under sections 435 and 439, Cr. P.C. has been moved on behalf of Hussain Khodai son of Yadullah against the order of Third Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi, dated 15th May, 1983 whereby it has been directed that both the Irani nationals may be deported to their Country.

The brief facts of the present case are that on 7th April, 1983 at 2.00 p.m. the Inspector Incharge, F.I.A. Passport Cell F.I.A, Karachi filed a case under section 419/471, P.P.C. against the petitioners. The contents of the F.I.R. are as under:--

"On 17th February, 1983, the complainant's report received from Karachi Airport and is reproduced below:

The Incharge Passport Cell,

F.I.A. Karachi.

Sub: OFF LOADING

The undermentioned/paxes alongwith the Passports and Airlines tickets, etc. mentioned each are sent to you for enquiry and legal action:-

S.

No.

Name

P.P.No.

Place a Date

of issue

Flight

No.

Remarks

date & time

1

Hussain

855744

1-2-1981

SK 976

During the checking Khodai Tehran

at 1230 of the passports of both the paxes

found their entry stamp of Taftan Check

Post are suspected to be forged, hence off loaded and are being sent up to you for further verification and legal action, alongwith travel documents .e. P.P.S. and valid tickets.

Sd/-Immig: Incharge Shift 'B'.

F.I.A. I a AS KAP-1".

On initial enquiry their passports mentioned above were sent to the Consulate-General of Iran, Karachi, who reported as under:-

"Mr. Hussain Farrokhi, Visa Officer of the Consulate-General after due examination of the two passports in question has expressed the following opinion:

"1. In Passport No. 855744, as mentioned above, the photograph is suspected to be replaced and it lacks exit permit from Iran.

"2. The Passport No. 2404465, as stated above, bears a replaced photograph and the stamps on pages 2, 3, 10, 11 are forged and the stamps on pages 10 and 11 are ordinary postage stamps of Iran which are not valid for this purpose.

It would be appreciated if the accused are tried by a Military Court and after the conviction, their passports may please be handed over to this Consulate-General for necessary action.

Please acknowledge receipt of the above passports returned herewith.

Thanking you for your co-operation,

Sd/- and round seal

Ghulam Raza Aluyezal

Acting Consulate-General,

Consulate-General of the Islamic

Republic of Iran, Karachi.

As the above accused persons have used and presented their forged passports as genuine documents before the Pakistan Immigration staff and they concealed their real identity and actual names knowing and wilfully with criminal intention to get departure from Pakistan Copenhagen/Lisbon (abroad).

The above circumstances/facts disclose the commission of offence punishable under section 419/471, P.P.C. A case accordingly registered against both the accused persons mentioned in Column 4 above and taken up for investigation.

Sd/ -

(Muhammad Rafique Mughal)

Sub-Inspector F.I.A. P.P. Cell

Karachi."

The applicant was challaned in the Court of Magistrate First Class, Karachi East. On 5th May, 1983 charge under section 419/471, P.P.C. was framed against him to which he pleaded guilty. Accordingly he was convicted and sentenced to three months' R.I. and to pay Rs. 5,000 or in default to undergo further R.I. for three months. It has also been ordered that being Irani national he be deported to his country after the expiry of his sentence. The applicant filed appeal against the sentence before the Court of Sessions The learned Sessions Judge modified the sentence of imprisonment of three months to the period already undergone and fine was also set aside. The learned Sessions Judge further ordered the deportation of the applicant from Pakistan to Iran The learned counsel for the applicant Mr. Raja Qureshi contended that F.I.R. was lodged against the applicant under section 419/471, P.P.C. and no section of Immigration Act or Pasport Act was applied, therefore, the order of deportation of the applicant is without jurisdiction. Mr. Makhdoom Abdul Wali the learned counsel for the State has submitted that the impugned order is bad in law as the learned Magistrate has not taken congizance of the offences under the Immigration Act and Passport Act. I have perused the record and found that applicant has been convicted under section 419 or 471, P.P.C. He has not been challaned under the Immigration Act. I am of the view that orders passed by the learned A.C.M. and the Sessions Judge suo motu without taking cognizance of the offences of immigration Act or Passport Act are without jurisdiction. I set aside the last portion of the order of the trial Court as well as of Sessions Judge. The necessary documents which have been secured from the petitioner may be returned after necessary verification if not required in any other case.

S. G. D. Revision accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous lower court advocate from Bagh lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.