Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

PARVEEN ALIAS PARVEEN FATIMA versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497/498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 506 (2) on the offense of fornication. Submitted one after another. A woman accused of adultery and having a lactating baby does not prove legal for half a month

1984 P Cr. L J 2493

[Karachi]

Before Ally Madad Shah, J

Mst. PARVEEN alias PARVEEN FATIMA--Applicant

versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No.963 of 1983, decided on 5th December, 1983.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S.497/498--Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), S.16--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.506(2)--Bail--Offence of Zina- Report of incident lodged after nearly one and a half months--Prosecution yet to prove if accused liable for offence of Zina--Accused a woman and having a suckling child--Bail granted.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant.

Muhammad Ibrahim, Additional Advocate-General for the State.

ORDER

The applicant Mst. Parveen alias Parveen Fatima is involved in Crime No.240/83 of P.S. New Town, Karachi, registered on 18th August, 1983, on a report lodged by Boota Maseeh, alleging that his daguther-in-law Mst. Parveen (the applicant herein) was enticed away by Talib Maseeh on 6th July, 1983. The case was registered for an offence punishable under section 16 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979, and also under section 506(2), P.P.C. She is alleged to have been guilty of Zina with Talib Maseeh. Bail Application filed on her behalf in the Court of IXth Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi, was dismissed by order, dated 10th November, 1983.

The facts pointed out by the learned Advocate for the applicant for consideration, briefly stated, are that the applicant is a woman and her case is covered by the provisions of subsection (1) of section 497, Cr.P.C. and secondly, the report was made after nearly one and half months, and thirdly, she was remanded to Darul Aman on 9th July, 1983, at her request, that she apprehended danger at the hands of her husband and she remained there till she was recovered on 27th August, 1983. On the other hand, the learned A.A.G. has stated that the applicant had illicit connections with. Talib Maseeh and there is evidence to that effect of four witnesses and also that she and Talib Maseeh had secretly embraced Islam and contracted marriage.

The broad facts to be considered for the purpose of grant of bail in this case are that the report of the incident was lodged after nearly one and half months and the applicant had remained in Darul Aman from 9th July, 1983 till 27th August, 1983. In the circumstances, prosecution has to prove that the applicant was liable of the offence of Zina. The other ground for consideration is that she is a woman and it is stated that she has a suckling child. Bail is granted in the sum of Rs.10,000 (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety to the satisfaction of the trial Judge.

M.Y.H. Bail granted

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Allahabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.