Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAHID AHMAD versus STATE


Criminal Code (CRPC) Property Against Section 497 Crimes (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 17 (3) Bail, allegedly the grant when the complainant was counting cash, two misdemeanor offenders Only one bag, admitted to the room and allegedly exported by the applicant applicant, is guaranteed

1984 M L D 1413

[Karachi]

Before Abdul Razzak A. Thahim, J

SHAHID AHMAD--Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE--Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 245 of 198.4, decided on 18th March, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Offence Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 17(3)--Bail, grant of--Allegedly while complainant was counting cash, two muffled faced culprits entered into his room and forcibly took away cash--Petitioner not named in F.I.R. nor put to identification test--Only a bag containing cash allegedly recovered from petitioner--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Khawaja Naveed Ahmad for Petitioner.

A.A. Muhammadally for the State.

ORDER

Applicant Shahid Ahmed is facing trial under section 17(3) of Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979.

The brief facts of the case are that on 27-9-1983 complainant Dabeer Ahmad was counting cash in his room at Cigarette shop at Landhi. It is alleged that two persons whose faces were half-muffled entered the room and forcibly took away the cash. Culprits also gave dagger injury to Abdul Ghaffar who was present in the shop. The applicant was arrested on 23-10-1983 and it is alleged that on 27-10-1983 he produced one empty bag.

Mr. Khawaja Naveed, learned counsel for the applicant contended that there is no recovery from the applicant. The allegation is that co-accused produced the property and the pistol, who is in custody.

Mr. A.A. Muhammadally, A.-A.G. for the State has no objection to grant of bail and submits that in the present case Police has failed to hold identification test of the applicant through the witnesses. It is admitted fact that the name of the applicant does not appear in F.I.R. A According to statement of Mr. A.A. Muhammadally no identification test has been held. The recovery is of only bag which contained money at the time of robbery. In so many cases it has been observed that deliberately Police has failed to arrange identification test. It is very necessary that identification test be made, when name of accused does not appear in F.I.R.

In view of the circumstances, I order that applicant Shahid Ahmed be released on bail on furnishing one solvent surely in the sum of Rs. 50,000 (Rupees Fifty Thousand) and one P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi. The order of this case be sent to I.-G. Police and Home Secretary.

S.G.D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Chowk Azam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.