Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDULLAH KHAN versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 307 and 324 Guarantees, Victim's Grant with two Wounded Wounds, one on the forearm has already been declared simple, while the back of the chest. There is a final document on the nature of the other wound. It has not yet been determined that there was any injury to a significant portion of the injured person, so further investigation is whether the applicant was planning to kill and is currently under section 324 more. In most cases, the PPC had granted bail to the applicant, circumstances

1984 M L D 1384

[Karachi]

Before Fakhruddin H. Shaikh, J

ABDULLAH KHAN--Applicant

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Bail Application No. 833 of 1984, decided on 29th August, 1984.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--

---S. 497--Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307 & 324--Bail, grant of- Victim suffering two incised wounds, one on fore-arm already declared simple while final certificate to nature of second wound on back of chest yet to be determined--Since none of injuries on vital part of injured it was, held, a matter of further inquiry as to whether applicant intended to commit murder and for present at most a case under S. 324, P.P.C. made out--Petitioner allowed bail, in circumstances.

Sardar Muhammad Ishaq for Applicant.

A.A. Muhammad alley, A.A.-G. for the State.

ORDER

A case under section 307, P.P.C. has been registered against the applicant, against whom the allegation is that he had attacked Naushad Khan with a knife and caused him two incised wounds. He had applied for bail but his application for bail was dismissed by Sessions Judge, Karachi.

2. The medical report shows that the injured had received one incised wound on the back of chest and another on fore-arm. The injury on fore-arm was declared to be simple. The nature of the other injury was reserved as the injured was sent for X-Ray. Although more than three weeks have passed, but no final certificate as to nature of the first injury has been determined. As none of the injuries is on the vital part of the injured, hence it is a matter of further inquiry whether the applicant intended to commit murder.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the injured had remained in the hospital for one day only and then discharged. Mr. 1A A.A. Muhammad ally is not able to controvert this statement. Prima facie it would appear that the offence, if at all committed by the applicant, would fall under section 324, P.P.C.

The bail application is, therefore, allowed. The applicant shall be released on furnishing surety in the amount of Rs. 10,000 and P.R. in like amount to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge, Karachi.

It may be observed that after receipt of the final report of the Doctor if it transpires that the injury on the back of chest is grievous in nature, the Sessions Judge shall be at liberty to consider whether the bail granted by this Court should be cancelled.

S. G. D. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Shamsabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.