Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAHIM AKHTAR versus I. G. POLICE OF SIND, KARACHI


Order of the Interim Constitution 1981 Article 9 Writing Jurisdiction, instead of filing a case under section 307, PPC to the police authorities on the request of the High Court's written jurisdiction, the case under the PPC High Court in the exercise of writ jurisdiction. It was requested to issue instructions for entry, even though it could not be held. Temporarily make an opinion as to whether a particular offense falls under section 307 or 324, PPC because it requires the recording of evidence, in which case the writ issuance was rejected.

1984 M L D 1281

[Karachi]

Before

Ajmal Mian and Haider

Ali Pirzada, JJ

FAHIM AKHTAR and others--Petitioners

versus

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE (SIND)

KARACHI and others--Respondents

Constitutional Petition No. 512 of 1984, decided on 11th June, 1984.

Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981)--

--Art. 9--Writ jurisdiction, invocation of--Writ jurisdiction of High Court invoked for issuing direction to Police authorities to register case under S. 307, P.P.C. instead of registering under S.324, P.P.C.--High Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction, held could not even tentatively form an opinion whether a particular offence falls under S. 307 or 324, P.P.C. as it requires recording of evidence--Issuance of writ declined, in circumstance.

Faizanul Haq for Petitioners.

ORDER

AJMAL MIAN, J.

--In this writ petition, the petitioners have sought direction against the Sub-Inspector, Police Station Orangi Town and also Superintendent, Police Orangi Town that they should register F.I.R. against respondents No. 4 to 6 under section 307, P.P.C. instead of registering under section 324, P.P.C. which has been done. In our view this Court in exercise of writ jurisdiction cannot even tentatively form an opinion, whether a particular offence falls under section, 307 or under section 324, P.P.C. as it requires the recording of the evidence. The appropriate course for the petitioner would have been invoke the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, which has provided exhaustive machinery for such eventualities. The petition is, therefore, dismissed in limine.

S. G. D. Writ Refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.