A. VIII, R11 Specific Relief Act (of 1877), has filed a lawsuit for plaintiff to declare the dismissal of the Section 42 trial, in which defendant filed a petition for the plaintiff's rejection. Time was legitimate. No evidence was presented by any of the parties, nor any document, even illegal sale mutation was brought on the record, nor any reference to the legality or validity of such documents. can go. The attorneys were not short or high but the abuse of that jurisdiction could not be sustained which challenged the mutation of the original sale and there was sufficient record of the revenue recorded by the illegal sales mutation and It was not necessary to challenge the challenge record just after the rights. o The matter of intoxication should be reviewed for the purpose of further investigation into the investigation by recording F. Evidence and other material available on the record were required to be considered because the defendant alleged that the dispute between the parties was law. And there was a mixed question of facts that needed proof and the matter could not be resolved unless it was recorded. The reason for the action in the plaintiff was properly requested and if it was considered to be correct and correct, the cause of action should not have been sought. Had to Imported decisions of both the courts were set aside in the light of the evidence or controversial questions related to the law and the trial.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014
