Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE


Like the co-accused of the session judge applicant who has already been released on bail by the Sessions Judge Petitioner, the Section 497 bail case of the accused applicant is also entitled to bail.

1983 S C M R 124

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and M. S. H. Qureshi, JJ

KHADIM HUSSAIN‑' Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Petition No. 169 of 1982, decided on 22nd June, 1982.

(Against the order of the Lahore High Court dated, 4‑4‑1987, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 766 ‑B‑82).

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑ S. 497‑Bail‑Case of accused petitioner similar to that of his co‑

accused already released on bail by Sessions Judge‑Petitioner, held, also entitled to bail.

Muhammad Iqbal, Advocate Supreme Court with Sheikh Sallahuddin, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Tanvir Ahmad Khan, Assistant Advocate‑General for the State.

Date of bearing : 22nd June, 1982.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.

‑‑Khadim Hussain petitioner was accused along-with some others of offences under section 302/148/149, P. P. C. His co‑accused Ramzan and Rafiq Masih were granted bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Faisalabad, but the application of petitioner was dismissed on the ground that his bail application had earlier been dismissed by the High Court. The petitioner again filed an application for grant of bail before the High Court which was dismissed on the ground that his earlier bail application had been dismissed.

Hence the present petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his case is abso lutely at bar with that of the aforementioned co‑accused who have been allowed bail by the learned Sessions Judge.

We issued notice to the Advocate‑General who has appeared in response thereto.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the material before us we are inclined to agree with the petitioner's counsel that his case is similar to that of his co‑accused released on bail by the Ses sions Judge. We, therefore, feel that the petitioner is also entitled to bail. The petition is converted into appeal and the petitioner is allowed bail I the sum of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, each in the like a Mount, to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Faisalabad.

Appeal allowed. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Tando Adam lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.