Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUSHTAQ versus SHAHZAD AKHTAR


Article 185 (3) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 307 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 497 all defendants were operating in pursuit of the default design and armed with the revocation of knife guarantee. Was denied, leave of appeal allowed

1983 S C M R 1274

Present: Nasim Hasan Shah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ

MUSHTAQ AND ANOTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

SHAHZAD AKHTAR AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents

Criminal Petition No. 147 of 1983, decided on 30th April, 1983.

(From the order, dated 16th March, 1983 passed by the Lahore High Court in Crl. Misc. No. 348/B of 1983).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)

--Art. 185(3)‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 307‑‑Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), S. 497‑All accused acting in concert in pursuance of pre‑planned design and had all come each armed with a chhuri‑Cancellation of bail, held, justified...‑Leave to appeal refused.

Ch. Muhammad Abdul Wahid, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Mehmood A. Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 30th April, 1983.

ORDER

M. S. H. QURAIHI, J.‑

Muhammad Hanif co‑accused and Mushtaq and Muhammad Iqbal petitioners allegedly attacked Shahzad Akhtar complainant and his brother Muhammad Ashfaq deceased with chhuris on 27‑8‑1982 at 6‑00 p.m. in the course of which the deceased received a fatal blow and the complainant an injury, at the hands of Muhammad Hanif co‑accused, while Shamshad, P. W. who had tried to intervene received a chhuri blow each from the two petitioners. The petitioners were allowed bail by the Additional Sessions Judge on the ground that the fatal blow was not attributed to them but on an application made by the complainant, the High Court cancelled their bail by its impugned order dated 16‑3‑1983. The High Court held the view that all the accused had acted in concert in pursuance of a pre‑planned design and that they had all corpe each armed with a chhuri.

2. After hearing learned counsel, we do not find any valid ground to justify an interference with the view taken by the High Court. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.

M. Z. M.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.