Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAIZ-UD-DIN versus MUHAMMAD YUSUF


Article 185 (3) was read with the Homeless Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958). Appeal allowed to appeal the transfer of land (i) whether the civil court has the authority to hear the land transfer case under the Act and (ii) whether the High Court for a proper trial and decision. The case remand can be decided and decided on its own, rather than outdated

1983 S C M R 1192

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Abdul Kadir Sheikh, JJ

FAIZ‑UDDIN AHMAD‑‑Petitioner

Versus

MUHAMMAD YUSUF AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 853 of 1979, decided on 3rd May, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment of Lahore High Court dated 4‑7‑1979 in Regular Second Appeal No. 683 of 1977).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---

---Art. 185(3) read with Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958)‑‑Transfer of land‑‑Leave to appeal‑‑‑Granted to examine (i) whether Civil Court possessed jurisdiction to try subject‑matter of suit relating to transfer of land under Act and (ii) whether High Court could, instead of remanding case for proper trial and decision, decide and decree suit itself.

Abid Hussain Minto, Advocate and Sh. Masud Akhtar Advocate‑on -Record for petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 3rd May, 1983.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH J.‑

‑After hearing the learned counsel we consider it a fit case for grant of leave‑ to appeal for examination of the following two questions :‑

(1) Whether the Civil Court had jurisdiction to try the subject‑matter o the suit in question, which related to the transfer of the property under Land Settlement Law 7 and

(2) Whether in case the civil Court has jurisdiction, the High Court should have, instead of remanding, the case for proper trial and decision by the learned trial Court (the plaint was rejected in this under order VII, rule 11), decided it itself, decreeing the suit in favour of the respondent

Order accordingly. Security Rs. 2,500.

The appeal shall be prepared for hearing within two months on the present record with liberty to the parties to file additional documents, if necessary,

S. Q. Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Naseerabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.