Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus ADMINISTRATOR (RESIDUAL PROPERTIES), MULTAN


Article 1 (185 (Leave) No questions about law or principle in the application for special leave appeal cannot be reopened. The questions of fact which are properly raised in this case cannot be reopened. [Question of fact) ]

1983SCMR1140

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ

MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND OTHERS‑Petitioners

Versus

THE ADMINISTRATOR (RESIDUAL PROPERTIES), MULTAN

AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 677 of 1981, decided on 7th February, 1983.

(On appeal from the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court, dated 3G3‑1981, in Writ Petition 16/R/1981),

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

---Art. 185 (3)‑Petition for Special Leave to Appeal‑No question of law or principle involved in case‑‑Questions of fact standing properly concluded‑Held, cannot be re‑opened.‑[Question of fact].

Sardar Nazar Hussain Dogar, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

A. R. Shaukat, Senior Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents No. 3.

Date of hearing : 7th February, 1983.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J

.‑Leave to appeal has been sought from order dated 30‑3‑1981, of the Lahore High Court, whereby a Constitutional petition arising out of an urban settlement case, was dismissed in limine.

Petitioners applied for the transfer of a property in 1979, which was transferred to the respondent No. 3 nearly two decades ago, on the plea that the said transfer was nor of the whole unit and that some parts thereof are available' for transfer under Settlement Scheme No. IX. The findings of fact, however, are that the whole of the property had been transferred and that petitioners' application suffered from inordinate delay, which would in law amount to laches.

After hearing the learned counsel who pressed arguments to challenge findings of fact, we do not consider it a fit case for reopening the questions of fact which stand properly concluded. No question of law or principle is involved. This petition is dismissed.

S. Q. Leave refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Noorpur nooranga lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.