Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MEHDI versus ALLAH BAKSH


The purpose of Article 185 (3) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 307 and 324 is that the accused, who had committed illicit contact with the daughter of the accused High Court, is sentenced to death from imprisonment to life imprisonment. The accused had served the family honor. Having a close relationship with the girl and acquitting the other accused with the charge of Section 307, PP: C and conviction under Section 324, PPC is only guaranteed if the person's death (unlawful with the girl). Building a relationship). Accusations were made available to the accused regarding the murder of the father of the deceased and that the attack in the joint and joint case of the other accused cannot be separated as far as the intention of murder is concerned, as per section 307. , PPC waived permission to appeal the test. Both the petitions filed by one complainant and the other by the offenders

1983 S C M R 1029

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and M. S. H. Quraishi, JJ

MUHAMMAD MEHDI‑Petitioner

versus

ALLAH BAKHSH‑Respondent

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeals Nos. 567 and 571 of 1980, decided on 7th March, 1983.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)---

---Art. 185(3)‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 307 & 324‑Murder‑Motive being that deceased carrying on illicit liaison with daughter of accused High Court reducing death sentence from death to life imprisonment on assumption that accused acted in vindication of family honour being closely related to girl and acquitting other accused from charge of S. 307, P. P: C. and convicting under S. 324, P. P. C. only‑ Contentions that even if point ‑ of honour could he relied regarding death of person (carrying on illicit relations with girl) no such mitigation was available to accused regarding murder of father of deceased and also that attack being joint and concerted case of other accused could not be separated in so far as intention to commit murder was concerned, accordingly acquittal under S. 307, P. P. C. required examination‑Leave to appeal granted in both petitions one having been filed from complainant side and other by convicts.

Nawab v. The State 1982 S C M R 484 ref.

Abdul Hafeez Qureshi, Advocate, Supreme Court and Iqbal Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Cr. P. 567/80).

M. B. Zaman, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court and M. A. Qadri Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Cr. P. 571/80).

Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 7th March, 1983.

ORDER

These two petitions arise out of a murder case wherein two persons Ghulam Rasool and his father Muhammad Shafi were done to death and several persons on the complainant side were injured. The motive was that Ghulam Rasool deceased was carrying on illicit liaison with Mst. Kanzi daughter of Zaman accused.

Criminal Petition No. 567/80 has been filed from complainant side for reversal of the order of the High Court whereby the sentence of death awarded to Allah Bakhsh and Ghulam Hussain was reduced to life imprisonment, on the assumption that they acted in vindication of family honour‑both were stated to be closely related to Mst. Kaniz. This petition is also directed against the acquittal of the other accused from charge of section 307, P. P. C. and conviction under section X24, P. P. C. only.

Learned counsel for the complainant has pointed out that even if point of honour could be relied regarding the death of Ghulam Rasool, no sue mitigation was available to the accused regarding the murder of Muhammad Shafi Learned counsel relied on Nawab v. The State (1982 S C M R 484), he also contended that the attack being joint and concerted, the case of the other accused could not be separated insofar as the intention to commit murder is concerned.

Accordingly, the acquittal under section 307, P. P. C. also require examination. We grant leave to appeal in this Petition No. 567 of 1980.

As the case would be examined in the appeal arising out of the connected petition we consider it just and proper to grant leave in the other connected Petition No. 571, bf 1980, which has been filed by the convicts.

M.Z.M Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates phone number from Timergara lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.