Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

HIRJINA & CO. (PAK.) LTD. versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN


Permission to consider Article 185 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Third Schedule, entry 43 (b) and the Central Excise Arrival Salt Act (1 of 1944), section 3 (i) with excise duty on alcohol The excuse given was in relation to the duty alcohol under section 3 (1) of the Act, which cannot be imposed for a constitutional bar and is it not permissible to impose duty on services through a hotel, restaurant or bar. ?
1983SCMR 789

Present : Abdul Qadir Shaikh, S. A. Nusrat and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ

HIRJINA & CO., (PAK.) LTD. AND OTHERS‑‑Petitioners

versus

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Civil Petitions Nos. K‑274 to K‑279 and K‑284 of 1982, decided on 10th November, 1982.

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

‑‑‑Art. 185(3) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Third Sched., Entry 43 (b) and Central Excises arid Salt Act (1 of 1944), S. 3(i) Excise duty on alcoholic liquor‑Leave to appeal‑‑Granted to consider whether duty levied under S. 3(1) of Act on excisable services was in relation to alcoholic liquor which could not be levied for constitu tional bar and whether levy of duty on services by hotel, restaurant or bar was constitutionally not permissible.

Khalid Anwar, Advocate Supreme Court with S. M. Abbas, Advocate‑on -Record for Petitioner (in C. P. K‑274 to 277 of 1982).

Faizan‑ul‑Haq, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in C. P. Nos. K‑278, K‑279 and K‑284/82).

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 10th November, 1982.

ORDER

ABDUL QADIR SHAIKH, J.‑

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the excise duty levied under section 3(1) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 in relation to excisable services provided or rendered in rela tion to alcoholic liquor is in its pith and substance, a duty on "alcoholic liquor" and cannot, therefore, be levied due to the bar contained under Entry 43 (b) of the Third Schedule of the 1962 Constitution. '

Learned counsel further submitted that even otherwise levy of duty on services by hotel, restaurant and bar, as an excise duty, is constitutionally not permissible.

These and other questions raised by the learned counsel are of general public importance and deserve an authoritative decision of this Court.

Leave is granted and the petitions are allowed. Security Rs. 2,500 in each case. Appeals will be heard on the present record. It is, however, open to the parties to file additional documents, if any.

Notice of Miscellaneous Petitions for grant of interim relief to issue to the Deputy Attorney‑General for a date in office.

Leave granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Kotli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.