Find a Lawyer

STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION versus SUMERA IQBAL

Section 2 (xxvii) Application for Recovery of Accidental Death Benefits The insurance company held that the death of the deceased was due to murder and assault and that such risk was excluded from the accidental death benefit \ insurance tribunal. Validated the asserted widow's claim that assault / murder was caused by malice or personal enmity, while accidental death was caused by unmanageable and unexpected external force. Those who were unusual in the incident took place unexpectedly and, without any apparent reason or fault, were injured in the suicide bombing late. Parts accepted their duty of martyrdom when they were injured in a suicide bombing, the death of the victim could not be treated as assault or murder because the risk was on the insurance company to the extent of the benefits of accidental death. Respondent was entitled to a retrieval of this claim \ r \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2014

• FARIDULLAH KHAN v. ABDUL GHANI 2014 YLR 922
• ABDUL WAHAB v. KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2014 PLC(CS) 926
• MUHAMMAD AMIR KHAN v. MUSHARAF KHAN 2014 YLR 931
• FARMANULLAH v. BASHIR 2014 MLD 932
• BAKHT TAJ v. UMAR REHMAN 2014 CLC 937
• Mst. BAKHT SABA v. The STATE through Additional Advocate-General 2014 MLD 942
• ABIDULLAH KHAN v. State 2014 PCrLJ 947
• LUTFULLAH v. MUBARAK SHAH 2014 YLR 956

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2014 →

top advocates from Topi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes