Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Applicants 18 and 22 were released on interim bail and have been consistent in judicial lockup since re-arrest, regardless of whether the Immigration Ordinance of 1979 18 and 22, he should be attracted to this matter. Bail is allowed at trial

1983 P Cr. LJ 2166

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

Haji MUHAMMAD ANWAR‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2310‑B of 1981, decided on 29th August, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑S. 497‑Emigration Ordinance (XVIII of 1979), Ss. 18 & 22‑Peti tioner released on interim bail and continuously in judicial lockup after re‑arrest‑Question whether Ss. 18 & 22 of Emigration Ordinance, 1979 attracted in case requiring consideration at trial ---Bail allowed.

Khawaja A. Waheed for Petitioner.

Yasin Kazi for the State.

ORDER

This is a bail application of Haji Muhammad Anwar in a case under section 420, P. P. C., Passport Act, 1974 and Emigration Ordinance, 1979 registered at P. S. F. I. A. vide F. I. R. No. 154 of 1980. The prosecution case against the petitioner is that on 29th November, 1980 the Inspector Incharge Passport Cell raided the premises of the petitioner and recovered 103 passports and other documents from his attache case. It is alleged that the petitioner received from various persons an amount of Rs. 2,50,000. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences under sections 18 and 22 of the Emigration Ordinance, 1979 are not attracted to the case of the petitioner inasmuch as the main ingredients of sections 18 and 22 are lacking. Learned counsel for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition.

2. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties 1 find that the petitioner was arrested on 29th November, 1980, released on interim bail and then re‑arrested on 16th December, 1980 and is continuously in the judicial lock‑up. The question whether sections 18 and 22 of the Emigra tion Ordinance, 1979 stand attracted to the peculiar facts and circumstances A of the case needs consideration and requires further inquiry. In the circumstances, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties to the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Rawalpindi.

H.Y.M. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Chowk Munda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.