Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GHULAM QADIR versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Applicant No. 2 is not subject to any type of injury and is solely attributed to Appellant No. 1, not to any injury to the assassin's guilt. 302/307/324/148

1983 P Cr. LJ 2159 (2)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

GHULAM QADIR AND OTHERS-Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE-Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2367-B of 1981-, decided on 2nd Septem ber, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) ---

---S. 497-Petitioner No. 2 not causing any injury to deceased and only lalkara attributed to him-Petitioner No. 1 not causing any injury to deceased-Bail allowed to petitioners in circumstances of case-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/307/324/148.

Ch. Imtiaz Ahmad Gill for Petitioners.

Mushtaq Hussain for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Ghulam Qadir and Ghulam Nabi in a case under section 302/307/324/148, P. P. C. registered at Police Station, Nishatabad vide F. I. R. No. 68/81 dated 3rd May, 1981.

The prosecution case is that the petitioners with others in furtherance of their common object caused the death of Abdul Hamid Khan on 2nd May. 1981 in the area of Chak 55/J. B. The allegation against petitioner No. 2 is that he raised a proverbial lalkara at the time of the occurrence and so far as petitioner No. 1 is concerned, he allegedly caused simple injury to Nazir Ahmad P. W. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has not controverted the nature of the accusation.

2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has opposed this application and states that it is a case of vicarious liability.

3. After hearing both the parties I find that petitioner No. 2 did not cause any injury to the deceased and only a lalkara is attributed to him and that petitioner No. 1 also did not cause any injury to the deceased. In the circumstances it is a matter of further inquiry. The petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C., Faisalabad.

M.Y.M. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Hazro lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.