Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 bail applicant equipped with SOTA but the victim was not hurt in any way. Is

1983 P Cr. LJ 2158

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

FAQIR MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2337‑B of 1981, decided on 2nd Septem ber, 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

‑‑---S. 497‑Bail‑Petitioner armed with sota but not causing any injury to deceased‑Allegation of his catching hold of deceased to facilitate murder, requiring further inquiry‑Bail granted.

Anwaar Ahmad Waraich for Petitioner.

Muhammad Arshad for the State.

ORDER

This is an application for bail on behalf of Faqir Muhammad in a case under section 302/307134, P. P. C. registered at Police Station Raiwind vide F. I. R. No. 31, dated 10th March, 1981.

2. The prosecution case is that the petitioner alongwith others caused the death of Muhammad Rafiq on 9th March, 1981, at 8.30 p. m. in the area of village Dheengariwala. So far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against hire is that at time of occurrence he was armed with sota and he caught hold of the deceased in order to facilitate his murder by the co‑accused.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the circum. stances of the case the question of vicarious liability of the petitioner needs consideration.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposed this application and submits that the petitioner having facilitated the crime is equally liable for the act of his co‑accused and that challan has been sub mitted in Court.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties I am of the opinion of that be as it may, the fact remains that the petitioner who was armed with a sota could cause injury to the deceased, but he did not cause any injury to him. The allegation against him that in spite of the fact that he was armed with sota, he caught hold of the deceased in order to facili tate the murder needs further inquiry. The petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C./Duty Magistrate, Kasur.

M.Y.M. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.