Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ZAHID AII versus STATE


Section 497 (I) of the Criminal Code (CRPC) is filed at the age of 141 when applicants are present, the case is first under section 497, Sentencing penalties (XLV of 1860), section 302 / 34 [Guaranteed Approval in Age Matters]]

1983 P Cr. LJ 2153 (2)

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Munir Khan, J

ZAHID ALI‑Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2374‑B of 1981, decided on 1st September 1981.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑----

‑‑ S. 497 (I)‑Petitioner aged 141 years at time‑ of occurrence‑Held, case falls within first proviso to S. 497‑Bail granted in circum stances of case‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302/34.‑[Age].

Khan Khuda Dad Khan Barki for Petitioner.

Malik Muhammad Yousaf Khan for the State.

ORDER

This is an application on behalf of Zahid Ali in a case under section 302/34, P.P.C. registered at Police Station, Gojra vide F.I.R. No. 192, dated 29th May, 1981. The allegations against the petitioner are that he alongwith Khalid Hussain in furtherance of common intention caused death of Muhammad Amin deceased by inflicting one knife blow on his chest. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record School Leaving Certificate wherein date of birth of the petitioner is shown as 2nd October, 1966. Learned counsel for the State submits that he is not in a position to challenge this date of birth of the petitioner. From the perusal of the order passed by the learned Sessions Judge dated 27th July, 1981, it appears that the contention of the petitioner that he was 141 years was not challenged by the A. P. P. Learned counsel for the State has opposed this application and submits that although the petitioner is below 16 years in age, yet he cannot be allowed bail as a matter of right for the reason that main role has been attributed to him.

2. After bearing the learned counsel for parties and without entering into the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that, be as it may, the, fact remains that the petitioner was of 141 years in age at the time of the alleged occurrence and his case falls within the first proviso of section 497: Cr. P. C. The petition is, therefore, allowed bail in the sum of Rs. 20,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Faisalabad.

M.A.X. Bail granted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
power of attorney advocate Jhal Magsi lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.